Surely its only FUD if the reader accepts without consideration of the headline media and content? We're constantly bombarded with mis-information, selective extracts of formal reporting, click baiting and spun narratives.ricky10 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:29 pmI have not come across any mainstream media that reports EV in an unbiased way (anti EV bias) Any red tops always dramatise EV FUD.Walter Eagle wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 4:23 pmEr, yeah. My thoughts exactly. Maybe not my choice of words. But you got your point across!ricky10 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:13 pm The more time battery stays at 100% charge the likely the damage is done to the battery.
Again it has nothing to do with safety.
Not sure how many times it takes for you to sink this in - SoC does not influence safety. If a battery decides yo go into a runaway chemical reaction low SoC will not stop it nor will high SoC encourage it. Just get that utter crap out of your mind and learn the truth about battery management instead of reading Red Top FUD
The usual FUD a few years ago is battery degradation (as the result of crappy Nissan Leaf BMS) but then Tesla shown them to be complete FUD.
Recently it is charging infrastructure and how EV will cripple the national grid which are all again FUD. If everyone has EV and able to charge at home and have V2G capability, it will actually prove to save a significantly amount of infrastructural spend on the national grid.
Now the latest FUD is on depreciation and insurance cost.
The original post was asked in good faith.
No steers or direction have actually been offered.
We're not all scientists or academics but realise the truth might just be out there?
Why not cease shooting down the EV media ether and start pointing out the sign posts to help owners, perspective owners, interested parties to get educated and informed?
Thank you.